On 2016/09/28 21:51, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Mon Sep 26, 2016 at 10:22:14PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2016/09/26 22:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> writes: > > > > > > > hi @ports, > > > > > > > > I know, a ports bump is required for HOMEPAGE/MASTER_SITES change but > > > > maybe to make an exception here because are so many sub-packages? > > > > Only for HOMEPAGE changes, MASTER_SITES changes don't affect the packages. > > > > > It *is* required, else packaging fails if you already built those on > > > your box. Which will happen for bulk builds machines. > > > > Absolutely. This is not something where exceptions are possible. > > Thanks jca@ and stu@ for your quick response. I understand, now! Next > question in the same scope and I'll not start a new thread. What to do > if a $HOMEPAGE and there $MASTER_SITES are down (because the project is > [maybe] dead) and the tarball is only hosted on openbsd tarball mirrors? > Delete both and bump REVISION only or should the port follow into the attic?
We usually mirror the distfile somewhere unless the port is utterly useless. BTW it's sthen@ - stu@ is someone else.
