On Fri Mar 10, 2017 at 08:01:06PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Hi > > I would like to add a new port for the crypto library botan 2. We > already have the botan 1.10 in ports, but they are not API compatible. > So I think it it best to put it under security/botan2. Note that > all internal paths do not conflict with the existing security/botan. > > Comment: > crypto and TLS for C++11 > > Description: > Botan (Japanese for peony) is a cryptography library written in > C++11 and released under the permissive Simplified BSD license. > Botan's goal is to be the best option for cryptography in new C++ > code by offering the tools necessary to implement a range of practical > systems, such as TLS/DTLS, PKIX certificate handling, PKCS#11 and > TPM hardware support, password hashing, and post quantum crypto > schemes. In addition to the C++, botan has a C89 API specifically > designed to be easy to call from other languages. A Python binding > using ctypes calling the C89 API is included. > > I have added one patch from upstream that makes the tests pass. > > The other patches convert the library naming to our schema. It > seems that upstream is respecting ABI compatibility the same way > we do, so I user their version numbering, which is 0.0 currently. > If a future version is incompatible, I can still add a patch to > override it. > > The python binding is included by default. It is only one file and > I don't think the effort of a py-subpackage is worth it. > > ok? > > bluhm
Build and test are fine on amd64: Tests complete ran 447037 tests in 91.53 sec all tests ok
