On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:21:02AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:28:05AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > You can't sanely run a desktop session with any browser using the > > default limits anyway... > > I disagree. I run firefox with low memory pressure: > > 97871 semarie 2 0 434M 320M sleep/1 poll 34:42 0.68% firefox > 95072 semarie 2 0 338M 260M sleep/1 poll 27:04 0.34% firefox > > (with two processes due to e10n). > > My session has 12 tabs opened with 3 or 4 tabs javascript enabled. But I > agree my use of firefox isn't representative of common use-case (no > videos or other ressources consuming websites). > > The running process is firefox-52.0 patched for allocating 128 Mo for > javascript (instead of 1 Go).
Ppl who dont like the current situation of having to either patch or raise your ulimits can propose constructive ideas on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347139 - with my limited time and interest into that never-ending problem of 'web browsers are piles of shitttons of code not designed with security in mind' (that personally not my pov), that's all i can do for now. Landry
