On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Hi, > > net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32 > bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on > crypt(3), which our libc doesn't support. End result: I was not able to > perform a single successful auth with Authen::TacacsPlus. Also the > logging code suffers from at least one stack overflow. So afaics the > current port is unusable. > > Our current port already needs patches to build with clang, along with > getpwnam_shadow & LP64 stuff (not all of them are fixed). Quite > a maintenance burden. > > So I propose to just delete this port for now. If people are actually > interested in tacacs+ support, they can still propose a new port based > on the newer, much cleaner releases published by the folks at > shrubbery.net. > > ok to kill it?
Your research is convincing. OK!
