On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:53:24AM -0400, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > My first thought was: "why add a FLAVOR?". If gpg/gpgme support is the > only way to avoid the need of plaintext credentials, maybe it should be > enabled by default? >
Very good question. I was thinking more for backwards compatibility, however that is still satisfied even if it is built with gpg/gpgme. So the only reason I can think of is to keep the dependencies down, although that seems like a silly excuse for such a small list of added dependencies. I'll re-do the patch with gpg/gpgme include without offering a flavor. Tim
