On Fri, May 10 2019, Timothy Brown <tbr...@freeshell.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:42:08PM -0600, Timothy Brown wrote: >> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:53:24AM -0400, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> > >> > My first thought was: "why add a FLAVOR?". If gpg/gpgme support is the >> > only way to avoid the need of plaintext credentials, maybe it should be >> > enabled by default? >> > >> >> Very good question. I was thinking more for backwards compatibility, >> however that is still satisfied even if it is built with gpg/gpgme. >> So the only reason I can think of is to keep the dependencies down, >> although that seems like a silly excuse for such a small list of >> added dependencies. >> >> I'll re-do the patch with gpg/gpgme include without offering a flavor. >> > > New patch generated without any FLAVOURS. > > Thoughts, OK?
LGTM ports-wise. Maybe Stuart has another opinion? NB: I did not review the usage of pledge() -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
