[including ports@] Theo de Raadt writes: > cho...@jtan.com wrote: > > > I recently posted a new CPAN module to ports@ which wraps pledge and > > unveil. There was a bit of a balls up because as a sysadmin I'm not > > really used to group development and what I've done has usually been in > > a corporate environment but in the end a complete tarball was posted. > > Well -- I do not make decisions in the ports environment. > > Other people lead that effort, and make decisions after weighing the > benefits and potential costs.
The question ultimately is how to I know if I'm completely finished with providing this port? If I need to do something more or promise on-going maintenance to get this minor port included in the big picture, that is to say: in OpenBSD's public CVS repository, then I'm happy to get it done. If it's enough to send in a tarball (as I've done already) and let the current ports maintainers take over then I'm (more than) happy to do that. Is "send a tarball to ports@ and forget about it" enough? Matthew
