On 6/13/2019 7:32 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:

On 2019/06/14 00:30, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote:
CVSROOT:        /cvs
Module name:    ports
Changes by:     st...@cvs.openbsd.org   2019/06/13 15:51:46

Modified files:
        databases/mariadb: Makefile

Log message:
simplify multipackages again, now that they are reunited between architectures.
from Brad.
This is going in the wrong direction.  Before revision 1.77
mariadb-client had a chance to build on at least* hppa.  I was so
disappointed by the attitude of Brad regarding by this commit that
I forgot to check all the changes for correctness.
Is there anyone with hppa who would like to try this? Or should we just
add it speculatively as I don't think there's really a downside ..

It couldn't hurt to just add it.

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/mariadb/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 Makefile
--- Makefile    13 Jun 2019 21:51:46 -0000      1.79
+++ Makefile    13 Jun 2019 23:30:40 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.79 2019/06/13 21:51:46 sthen Exp $
# archs with atomic ops
-ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=        alpha aarch64 amd64 arm i386 mips64 mips64el powerpc 
sparc64
+ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=        alpha aarch64 amd64 arm hppa i386 mips64 mips64el 
powerpc sparc64
COMMENT-main= multithreaded SQL database (client)
  COMMENT-server=       multithreaded SQL database (server)
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ LDFLAGS+=   -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
CONFIGURE_ENV= LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}" -.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc"
+.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "hppa"
  LDFLAGS+=     -latomic
  WANTLIB+=     atomic
  .endif



Reply via email to