13 août 2019 13:27 "Klemens Nanni" <k...@openbsd.org> a écrit:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > >> Sorry, but i dont think this makes sense. With your reasoning, 2 extra >> lines will be displayed at the end of pkg_add, for a 2-lines README. >> lots of indirections for not much information... and we already know >> users dont read them anyway. > > I agree that the indirection could be avoided, but people *do* read > these readmes. > >> I doubt ppl will come to filter-rspamd directly (and then wonder how to >> set it up, in that case they will lookup HOMEPAGE), they might be more >> 'directed' at it by a mention of this same example in smtpd.conf(5) or a >> commented out entry in the default smtpd.conf. > > Well, I know smtpd and we have packages for it, so I search the packages > to see what I can do. I hate having to open some HOMEPAGE only to find > out how to use a port: that is was README and/or MESSAGE is for. > > My goal is to provide packages which include all neccessary information > if possible, without forcing users through web browsers. > >> Adding a README for 2 lines is abusing the README mechanism imo. > > I'm also fine with amending DESCR or putting it in MESSAGE, as long as > I don't have to guess where to start after installing the package, > because I personally would be one of those users that would install it > only to find no manual or documentation whatsoever, angrily going though > smtpd(8) and smtpd.conf(5) first hoping for examples, then falling back > to the web. I have added a README ok ?
opensmtpd-filter-rspamd.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
