On 2019/11/04 10:45, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > If it turns out we need libluv for things other than neovim, then that's > > probably the simplest way (different directories rather than filenames > > usually make it easier to point other ports at the right one) - but > > for now this feels like a sane approach. > > So do I read it correctly that we should continue using the bundled luv > until another port needs it too? Or do we bite the bullet and just do > the luv port form the outset? > > Thanks > > -- > Best Regards > Edd Barrett > > http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk >
Yes I think bundled. When there's another actual user we'll have some idea which lua version it needs, etc.