On 2019/11/18 18:42, Tim Kuijsten wrote: > > Btw, could we make the proctitle slightly nicer on the cpu-bearing process? > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND > > 19404 wsep 39 0 1440K 3232K onproc/1 - 0:07 27.88% tun0 > > You mean make it more clear in top(1) that tun0 is a process of wiresep? > > What about prefixing all processes with "ws" so that we would get: > root 82906 0.0 0.0 608 1844 ?? Ip Sun11PM 0:00.01 wsmaster > (wiresep) > 3901 8190 0.0 0.1 728 2352 ?? Ip Sun11PM 0:11.39 wstun0 > (wiresep) > 3900 50475 0.0 0.0 672 2072 ?? Ip Sun11PM 0:00.04 wsproxy > (wiresep) > 3900 84443 0.0 0.1 656 2196 ?? Ip Sun11PM 0:00.47 wsenclave > (wiresep) >
most daemons that change their proctitle still have the process name first, e.g. wiresep (master), wiresep (tun0), .. or wiresep: master, wiresep: tun0, ..
