On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:36:00 +0100 Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:50:33AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Is there any way to phrase this so that we don't have fix version? > > This would save recurring updates. > > Hum... the situation with compilers is confusing enough that having > some kind of handle as to which version is which is actually useful, > as long as people remember to update.
Agreed, not so long ago i've seen a commit message hinting base-gcc is 3.xx, it's 4.2.1 actually ;) > How about a comment in gcc/8/Makefile, reminding us to update the > version? I'm not sure if the wording is proper, but here is a try: Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gcc/8/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.28 Makefile --- Makefile 3 Dec 2019 21:18:26 -0000 1.28 +++ Makefile 11 Jan 2020 12:03:06 -0000 @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ USE_LLD = No DPB_PROPERTIES = parallel +# XXX sync bsd.port.mk's manpage if the version is changed V = 8.3.0 REVISION = 4 FULL_VERSION = $V
