On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:36:00 +0100 > Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:50:33AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > Is there any way to phrase this so that we don't have fix version? > > > This would save recurring updates. > > > > Hum... the situation with compilers is confusing enough that having > > some kind of handle as to which version is which is actually useful, > > as long as people remember to update. > > Agreed, not so long ago i've seen a commit message hinting base-gcc is > 3.xx, it's 4.2.1 actually ;) > > > How about a comment in gcc/8/Makefile, reminding us to update the > > version? > > I'm not sure if the wording is proper, but here is a try:
Shorter > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gcc/8/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.28 > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.28 Makefile > --- Makefile 3 Dec 2019 21:18:26 -0000 1.28 > +++ Makefile 11 Jan 2020 12:03:06 -0000 > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ USE_LLD = No > > DPB_PROPERTIES = parallel > > +# XXX sync bsd.port.mk's manpage if the version is changed +# XXX sync bsd.port.mk(5) when the version changes > V = 8.3.0 > REVISION = 4 > FULL_VERSION = $V > >
