-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> > Why did you bump the major. I tried browsing the history on Gitlab to
> > see what changed in the API, but couldn't see much. I am sure I missed
> > something.

ah, just because I thought it should be bumped when the compiler changed.
no intension other than that.


> As shown by /usr/src/lib/check_sym ("No dynamic export changes"), and
> a diff of the installed include file, the shared lib version bump
> appears unnecessary.

right. I confirmed check_sym too with my local packages. 

  % ls -al /tmp/yozo/*/lib/*.so.*
  -rw-r--r--  1 yozo  wheel  72472 Jan  1  1970 
/tmp/yozo/1.11p0/lib/libcerf.so.2.0
  -rw-r--r--  1 yozo  wheel  69400 Jan  1  1970 
/tmp/yozo/1.13/lib/libcerf.so.3.0
  % /usr/src/lib/check_sym /tmp/yozo/*/lib/*.so.*
  /tmp/yozo/1.11p0/lib/libcerf.so.2.0 --> /tmp/yozo/1.13/lib/libcerf.so.3.0
  No dynamic export changes
  External reference changes:
  added:
        floor
  
  removed:
        sqrt
  
  PLT removed:
        dvoigt
  
  % 

only external dependency diff,
libcerf compiled with gcc depends on sqrt in libm, and
libcerf compiled with clang depends on floor in libm.


> > Is the gnuplot bump necessary? Why?
>
> Maybe Yozo found it useful for testing, but it doesn't seem useful for
> the ports tree.

yes yes (-:
that's what I want someone to check if ok, I'm not sure if it's ok
for gcc compiled application to dynamically load clang-compiled library...

  -- yozo.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SSAg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to