On 2020-07-28 19:19, Brian Callahan wrote:
On Monday, July 27, 2020 3:41 PM, Nils Reuße <n.reu...@hxgn.net> wrote:
On 2020-07-27 19:49, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi Nils --
On Friday, July 24, 2020 2:56 PM, Nils Reuße n.reu...@hxgn.net wrote:
On 2020-07-15 22:59, Nils Reuße wrote:
On 2020-07-15 16:58, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2020-07-14, Nils Reuße n.reu...@hxgn.net wrote:
I am not too sure about adding "-I$(top_srcdir)" to the DEFAULT_INCLUDES
in the two Makefiles (for the two subdirectories), but I couldn't get it
to compile otherwise. The affected includes are in subdirectories of
the source, but the compilation step is executed from build_amd64, and
then the already present "-I$(top_builddir)" resolves to .. (the top dir
of build_amd64) and not the top dir of the source code subdir.
Presumably that problem is caused by SEPARATE_BUILD. Patching
around problems caused by SEPARATE_BUILD is not worth it, just drop
the SEPARATE_BUILD.
Thanks, that did the trick. The attached diff has removed the
SEPARATE_BUILD variable as well as the superfluous Makefile.in-patches.
Kind regards
Nils
Friendly fridays ping ;)
If you're going to use the gnu servers, it is best to use
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=gnubg/}. Has the added benefit of using https
too.
When I run `make update-plist`, the PLIST changes.
~Brian
Hey Brian,
thank you for looking into it, new diff attached ;)
Made one small tweak: your latest diff has
MASTER_SITES=MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GNU:gnubg/}
when all you need is
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GNU:gnubg/}
ok with me if someone wants to commit with that tweak.
But before this gets committed--do you want to be MAINTAINER?
~Brian
Hey Brian,
thanks, the mistake in MASTER_SITES was sloppy on my side, sorry for that.
Regarding taking maintainership, even though I don't know too much about
the software, it does not seem to change too often, so yeah, count me in ;)
Best,
Nils