> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:41:28AM -0800, Steve Cooper wrote:
> 
> > Here's the line from our trans.exp file:
> > 
> >    /^om_.*/      lmtp:inet:opus.allegro.com:24
> > 
> > And, the corresponding line in main.cf:
> > 
> >    transport_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/trans.exp
> > 
> > This all worked fine with the old version.
> > 
> > Now, mail destined for om_* addresses get delivered to 
> Samsung Contact, but
> > they hang around in the mail queue most of the time.  mailq 
> shows entries like:
> > 
> > 8A30B524652    35124 Thu Jan  6 11:08:31  g...@wti.com
> > (conversation with opus.allegro.com[10.84.2.10] timed out 
> while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than
> > once)
> >                                          o...@allegro.com
> >                                          o...@allegro.com
> >                                          o...@allegro.com
> >                                          o...@allegro.com
> >                                          om...@allegro.com
> > And, eventually, the message is sent more than once.  It 
> appears that each time it is sent, one more recipient
> > disappears off the list.  But the entire remaining list 
> gets the message again when postfix reprocesses
> > the message.
> 
> Their LMTP service is broken, and does not provide multiple replies
> when multiple LMTP recipients are in the same envelope. You need to
> set "lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1". You could create a clone
> 
>     lmtpdumb  unix  -       -       n       -       -       lmtp
> 
> transport and set:
> 
>     main.cf:
>       lmtpdumb_destination_recipient_limit = 1
> 
>     transport.exp:
>       /^om_.*/      lmtpdumb:inet:opus.allegro.com:24
> 
> LMTP servers are supposed to support multiple recipients and emit
> multiple 250 replies at the end of the transaction, one for each
> recipient. This LMTP server appears broken. If the same service is
> available over SMTP use that instead.
> 
> -- 
>       Viktor.
> 

Brilliant!  That works perfectly.

Thank you very much, Viktor.

Sincerely,

Steve

Reply via email to