On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, "ml" <m...@smtp.fakessh.eu> wrote: > > > Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit : > > 2012/2/1 ml <m...@smtp.fakessh.eu>: > > > > > > Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : > > >> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > >> > > > >> > Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema < wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > > >> > >> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at > > >> > >> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no > > >> > >> particular order are: > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases like > > >> > > this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking > > >> > > > >> > who is Simon Mudd? > > >> > > > >> > rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes > > >> > was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM > > >> > > > > > > i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 > > > for fine for me > > > The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. > > > I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied > > > correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm > > > > > > still rpm source is disponible here > > > http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm > > > > Yeeeeah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that > > I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about > > the trust factor perhaps. > > > I assure you that my work is correct and that my rpm is ok
Sadly you weren't being judged on your work but on the quality of your second, or third, language.. The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's rpm's will do. I'm sure other people will thank you tho. Simon
