On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Simon Brereton <simon.brere...@buongiorno.com> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, "ml" <m...@smtp.fakessh.eu> wrote: >> >> >> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit : >> > 2012/2/1 ml <m...@smtp.fakessh.eu>: >> > > >> > > Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit : >> > >> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit : >> > >> > >> > >> > Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani: >> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema >> > >> > > <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at >> > >> > >> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html] >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in >> > >> > >> no >> > >> > >> particular order are: >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Does anyone know how soon Simon Mudd usually responds to releases >> > >> > > like >> > >> > > this? Not trying to hurry anyone, *just* asking >> > >> > >> > >> > who is Simon Mudd? >> > >> > >> > >> > rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes >> > >> > was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via >> > >> > RPM >> > >> >> > > >> > > i build with succes a rpm for postfix 2.9.0 for centos 5 >> > > for fine for me >> > > The main work was done not just SJ Mudd i have adapts required. >> > > I still have problems with the patch VDA standard is not to be applied >> > > correctly error that prevents the construction of the rpm >> > > >> > > still rpm source is disponible here >> > > >> > > http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/postfix-2.9.0-1.pcre.pgsql.mysql.sasl2.dovecot.sqlite.rhel5.src.rpm >> > >> > Yeeeeah, I'll stick with Simon, who I think can write a sentence that >> > I can read - even if his package will take longer. Something about >> > the trust factor perhaps. >> >> >> I assure you that my work is correct and that my rpm is ok > > Sadly you weren't being judged on your work but on the quality of your > second, or third, language..
Having thought about it, I agree with you, I was a bit harsh given the language barrier. It's not fair to smart people who may not speak English so well, but when you see an email from someone new that is really hard to understand and not written in even simple sentences and without spell check, well, you do have to make *some* judgments. Anyway, sorry to "ml" (another reason to be iffy). > The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's rpm's will do. Yes, as they've built a reputation for being quite reliable and well done.
