On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote:
> Maybe check that SASL give a respons, and if not just tmp fail it. or
> someother check.
The proposed patch is incorrect. Please reply on-list only.
> --- ../../../postfix-2.9.6/src/smtpd/smtpd_sasl_glue.c 2011-12-18
> 19:03:44.000000000 +0100
> +++ smtpd_sasl_glue.c 2014-02-05 09:59:29.893752433 +0100
> @@ -316,8 +316,13 @@
> state->namaddr, sasl_method,
> STR(state->sasl_reply));
> /* RFC 4954 Section 6. */
> - smtpd_chat_reply(state, "535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: %s",
> - STR(state->sasl_reply));
> + if (state->sasl_reply != NULL) {
> + smtpd_chat_reply(state, "535 5.7.8 Error: authentication
> failed: %s",
> + STR(state->sasl_reply));
> + }
> + else {
> + smtpd_chat_reply(state, "454 4.7.0 Temporary authentication
> failure");
> + }
> return (-1);
> }
> /* RFC 4954 Section 6. */
