Peer Heinlein:
> You got it. That's what we ARE doing and that's why I'm asking for. :-)
Well this is a very non-standard deployment. I have to spend my
limited cycles wisely on things that benefit the most people.
> We have situations, where a mail MUST send using TLS. And I need a
> FAST and reliable DSN back to the sender if that's not possible.
If it MUST be TLS, then why can't mail wait until the destination
is "repaired"?
Are you blindly requiring TLS without even thinking about whether
the remote party supports it?
Wietse
