> On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:16 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Note also that for this to be a meaningful mail archive, you should lose the > original envelope recipient addresses (which happens with always_bcc) and > instead use a recipe based on "recipient_bcc_maps" with regular expression > mappings that capture each unique recipient as a unique archive recipient > address.
s/should lose/should not lose/
Sorry about any confusion.
--
Viktor.
