postfix-users

Messages by Date

2026/08/31 [pfx] Once more, please drop TLSA RRs matching newly retired Let's Encrypt issuer CAs Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/31 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/31 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/30 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/30 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? monodev via Postfix-users
2026/08/30 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/30 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: smtpd/cleanup accept-lock contention much worse on kernel 6.1 vs 4.14 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Little issue with DOwnload links Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] smtpd/cleanup accept-lock contention much worse on kernel 6.1 vs 4.14 ? RM via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Little issue with DOwnload links Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Alexander Leidinger via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/28 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Sad Clouds via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Re: Postfix and LLM contributions? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/27 [pfx] Postfix and LLM contributions? Ellie via Postfix-users
2026/08/21 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Mel P via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
2026/08/20 [pfx] Pflogsumm Version 1.3.0beta01 Released Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: file system clock is 1 seconds ahead of local clock Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: file system clock is 1 seconds ahead of local clock Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Linkcheck via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Linkcheck via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Linkcheck via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: file system clock is 1 seconds ahead of local clock Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] file system clock is 1 seconds ahead of local clock Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim P. via Postfix-users
2026/08/19 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Linkcheck via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format Erwan David via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend? RM via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/17 [pfx] OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend? Rajesh Mishra via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Mel via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Pflogsumm Version 1.2.2alpha02 Released Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Matthias Andree via Postfix-users
2026/08/15 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Eray Aslan via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Pflogsumm Version 1.2.2alpha01 Released Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Mel via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Xavier Humbert via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0 Gerard Seibert via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/14 [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27 Herbert J. Skuhra via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Bill Cole via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/13 [pfx] Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
2026/08/12 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/11 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/10 [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/10 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/09 [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? postfix--- via Postfix-users
2026/08/09 [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/09 [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/09 [pfx] fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? lama--- via Postfix-users
2026/08/08 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems) Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems) Claus Assmann via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/08/07 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
2026/08/06 [pfx] Heads-up for Postfix distribution maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/05 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/05 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
2026/08/05 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/05 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems pyllyukko via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/08/04 [pfx] content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
2026/07/28 [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/07/28 [pfx] New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
2026/07/27 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
2026/07/26 [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/26 [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Randy Bush via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Randy Bush via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/25 [pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay Thomas Franz via Postfix-users
2026/07/24 [pfx] Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
2026/07/24 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
2026/07/24 [pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/24 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/24 [pfx] destination_rate_delay Thomas Franz via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/23 [pfx] dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/21 [pfx] Question about postfix cleanup fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/19 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/18 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/18 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/18 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/18 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/17 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/17 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/17 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters Claus Assmann via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/16 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/15 [pfx] cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
2026/07/09 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/07 [pfx] ANN: list.sys4.de: DNSSEC temporary disabled Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
2026/07/06 [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/06 [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/06 [pfx] Re: Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications) Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
2026/07/06 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Scott Techlist via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Christian Pfeiffer via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
2026/07/05 [pfx] [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
2026/07/03 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users
2026/07/03 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 John Levine via Postfix-users
2026/07/02 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
2026/07/02 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
2026/07/02 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
2026/07/02 [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

Earlier messages