You guys!!! Everyone knows that all of these issues were sorted out in the Algol68 report, where semi-colons were chosen as indicating activities that must take place in sequential fashion, and commas were chosen as indicating activities that could happen in a random order.
So A := 38; B := A was guaranteed to evaluate correctly, whereas A := 38, B := A might not since it could be that the value to which A refrers at the time of the second assignment statement is undefined. A lot of these ideas made their way into C eventually, including the idea that the order of evaluation of expressions in a comma-delineated list was undefined. Paul Ramsey wrote: > My intuition that it worked left-to-right came from Perl... where'd > your reverse intuition come from, Mark? (Languages are so > multifarious...) > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Fascinating. Being self-taught in C, it's always interesting to learn >> something new - even if it does go against intuition :) >> > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > -- Regards, Chris Hermansen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel+1.604.714.2878 · fax+1.604.733.0631 · mob+1.778.232.0644 Timberline Natural Resource Group · http://www.timberline.ca 401 · 958 West 8th Avenue · Vancouver BC · Canada · V5Z 1E5 _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users