On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:21 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > I (OS/X 10.5, geos trunk) got no failures in regress_ogc under your > patch. We'll see what it was tomorrow I guess.
Okay, it's all sorted now - it was a mismatch between LF and CR/LF files from SVN. The file in question (regress_ogc_expected) had an explicit svn:eol-style property set to native; I've removed this but on a fresh checkout I still get CR/LF endings on the *_expected files which causes diff on MingW to fail. Hmmmm. I suspect that the regression tests will need rewriting in the near future anyway, but as long as the release checkout comes from a UNIX-type SVN client, there won't be any problems. I think we're about good to go at this end - any takers for checking Solaris? ATB, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts http://www.siriusit.co.uk T: +44 870 608 0063 _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
