Paul Ramsey wrote:
FYI, it is not the index that is slower, it is the op. The index is actually (surprisingly) faster.

Wow, that's unexpected. Do you know why this is? Is there a message there for the current 2D GIST index?

--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to