I have no great love of HTML email ... and I would not normally create HTML email even if I could.
The problem is that other people do, and I am at a major disadvantage when I am in a discussion with others would are using highlighting or color to call out parts of the discussion. If I start participating I screw it up for everybody else ... which does not make a lot of friends. /lss -- Larry S. Samberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] VM/Fax: 270-514-0557 Skype: larrysamberg Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. --Antoine de Saint-Exupery On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:47:10 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >As Hiro points out there is a huge debate about email. I feel that many >of us who only use text only are losing the battle though. However, a >great deal of PM users use the product because it is only a text email >application. However, there is a way to send HTML, but this is a >workaround (sending the HTML file as an attachment with no body has >already posted). The PowerMail staff has been adding limited (and better) >support for HTML, but it's a balancing act. > >There are just as many reasons for not having HTML emails as there are to >having it, but end the end it's a religious war. > >Wayne > >-----Original Message----- >From: A-NO-NE Music <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Mar 7, 2005 9:32 AM >To: PowerMail Discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Love PowerMail but... > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 05.3.6 / 09:12 PM wrote: > >>The only feature I miss is being able to format outgoing text for those >>who receive HTML mail. > > >You'd be interested to know that we the long-time PM users are who >believe email should be nothing but plain text :-) > > >-- > >- Hiro > >[PROTECTED] ><[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]> > > > > >
