Rick Lecoat on 4/20/07 said

>Is this something that I actually care about? No, because as I said, I
>hardly ever print any sort of email. But Winston cares about it, and I
>think that he is right to (and *has* every right to). He's not out of
>line here.
>
>I *do* care that a valid concern by a list member is being trivialised
>on the grounds that his needs do not tally with the needs of others. 
>We're better than that.

Thanks for pointing this out Rick.
Over the last days I actually came to agree with Winston in the html
printing request.

This is how I came to a change: A lot of times when I print I like to
print to PDF so that I have a copy of something that is platform
independent. Printing with no dialog box does not allow this. If
attempting to print from the html rendering produced a message "printing
from this screen is not possible at this time" I think that would be
acceptable. It is the behavior that ACTS like a normal printing process
is going on when it actually isn't that seems to be bothersome.

As far as having the headers, I don't see them when the html is rendered
so I'm not sure how they could be printed. It is true that if everyone
ceased using html or used properly formatted html with its text component
we wouldn't have this problem.. but I think that not happening is why CTM
was willing to using the Safari rendering engine in the first place to
display this type of mail. 

Not that I'm going to stop using PowerMail, I've tried it and couldn't
stand not using it...

-- 
Barbara Needham


Reply via email to