We can all hope so! This is an irritating issues for many. The web links issue is a real pain too.
I sure hope CTM is working on new releases. As all of us purchased PM when a "free" mail client was available there may still be a sufficient number of customers who would pay again for a major upgrade. Time will tell, so I keep an eye out for alternatives just in case...but none look like they are worth the switching effort - as email is so important to me, the purchase price cost is imaterial in relation to getting a tool that works for me. If PM 7 removed a few more PM irritations I'd upgrade at once. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Bill Schjelderup, President b...@companioncorp.com COMPanion Corporation 801-365-0555 voice 1831 Fort Union Blvd. 801-943-7752 fax Salt Lake City, Utah 84121-3041 www.companioncorp.com +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Nusquam est qui ubique est. - He who is everywhere is nowhere. This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient, I'm sorry to bother you and will attempt to address my messages more carefully in the future. >On 25 February Peter Lovell <plov...@mac.com> wrote: > >> I'm also having a *lot* of problem with PM not dealing with >> multi-part MIME content boundaries, such as >> Content-type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary*0=----000000000000000000000000000000000000; >> boundary*1=000000000000000000000000000 >> >> I get many messages formatted this way and PM is useless - >> it shows zero content!. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. This is a >> real pain. > >Checking my files, I see that this issue was raised last September by >the 'usual suspects'. I find it seriously annoying with my only solution >being to read the affected mail on-line. Far from ideal, especially when >I want to keep the message. Now that CTM is up-to-date with PM and >FoxTrot, perhaps we'll see some action. > >-- Charles > > > >
