Crystal River is same as Harris plant. Thanks, Bryant Akins Superintendent Radiation Control Crystal River Nuclear Plant work cell 352-464-7964 [email protected]
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seabock, Mike Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools? Contaminated articles placed in the Hot Tool Room should have fixed contamination less than or equal to 1,000 ncpm by direct frisk. Articles too large to be placed in the SAM should have fixed contamination less than or equal to 1,000 ncpm by direct frisk. Items that alarm the Hot Tool Room SAM should be placed in the area designated for decon. Michael Seabock Lead Radiation Control Specialist - ALARA Harris Nuclear Plant T- 919.362.2808 P- 919.982.5466 [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Johns, Alex M. Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools? Salem Station also uses no detectable by smear and 2K ccpm fixed for "hot" tool room storage. Special storage for items with higher values: i.e. tag, bag, etc.. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Earls, Leonard Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 6:21 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools? STP uses 2000 ncpm on a standard frisker fixed contamination, no detectable by smear. No limit for tool monitor, total activity. Regards, Leonard Earls 361-972-7759 ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 17:18 To: [email protected] Subject: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools? This question has probably been asked and answered before but I'm wondering what you'all use for acceptable limits for contamination on hot tools (not those specifically designated for containment). I assume no detectable smearable (< 1k dpm/100 cm2) but how about fixed? 5k dpm/probe area? Any specific criteria for what total activity the tool exhibits if placed in a SAM? Such as 20 nCi (~50k dpm)? Thanks, Eric (San Onofre HP Tech Support) Eric M. Goldin, CHP Southern California Edison <[email protected]> ----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to: [email protected] If Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at [email protected] ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written authorization from PSEG. This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving PSEG. Thank you for your cooperation.
