Watts Bar does not either,

 

I totally agree with Jeff - I have tried to get my Fleet to do this,
everyone says sample prep is too hard. My passion for health physics
would love to take on the challenge.

 

I think I remember a President that said "we do these things not because
they are easy rather because they are hard"

 

Raymond Rouse

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: Benchmark: Alpha Spec

 

Dresden does not use alpha spectroscopy.

 

My opinion only....

 

The ability to observe a spectra for anomalies in the region of interest
goes a long way in convincing stake holders you have a robust program
and are doing everything in you power to look for transuranics despite
the presence of radon product daughters.

 

The commercially available products that automatically compensate for
radon progeny get you within chipping/putting distance but often do not
provide the manner of relief we all desire. For example, the raw alpha
count may indicate 20 DAC if it is all assumed to be Am-241. The
"striped" analysis may reduce this down to 1 DAC or so. Although the
result is much closer to reality, it does not provide us relief from
posting and investigating etc., etc., etc... To make the matter worse,
sometimes the "striped" results will show a negative number which
frequently results in both the technicians and outside observers being
skeptical of the results.

 

With spectroscopy, you can rely on professional judgment but the chart
is something both technicians and regulators can relate to. Below is a
scatter plot of an air sample collected on a PTFE filter. It was counted
about 1.5 hours after being collected.

 

 

 

A scatter plot is worth a thousand words!!!

 

Jeffrey J. Cady, MS, CHP, RRPT
Mgr RP Technical Support
Exelon Nuclear 
Dresden Station
6500 North Dresden Road
Morris, IL 60450-9765
Phone: (815) 416-2719
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Holmes, Stephen J:(Constellation)
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 11:41 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Powernet: Benchmark: Alpha Spec

 

At Ginna, we are evaluating purchasing Alpha Spec equipment (such as the
Canberra Alpha Analyst with Alpha Apex software). Part of our
justification for this expense would be to reduce our reliance on
independent laboratories for performing alpha characterization (i.e. per
the EPRI alpha monitoring guidelines). We currently have Ludlum 3030Ps
and MGPI ABPMs which use alpha spec in a limited manner to perform radon
rejection, but no true alpha spectroscopy equipment. We would like to
know what the rest of the industry is doing; any experience, comments,
or feedback are appreciated.  

 

Do you have Alpha Spec capabilities at your facility?

 

 

If so, what equipment do you use?

 

 

What do you use the equipment for (e.g. radon rejection or a
quantitative alpha spectrum of individual nuclides)?

 

 

 

If using for alpha spectrum analysis, what energy resolution can you
achieve?

 

 

 

What type of sample preparation is required?

 

 

 

Any other equipment strengths/limitations or lessons learned you would
like to share?

 

 

Thanks,

-Steve

 

Stephen J Holmes, PE

Sr. Plant Health Physicist, CENG-RE Ginna NPP

[email protected] 

585-771-3577; 585-545-1661 (cell)

 

>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,
professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely
for the
addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the
information
in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender.
-IP2

************************************************** This e-mail and any
of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary
information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright
belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. This e-mail is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action
taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. Thank
You. **************************************************

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to