It is probably easier for you to reply via email, but I would enjoy talking 
with you.

When we drain the cavity following refueling we typically find contamination 
levels exceeding 1,000,000 dpm/100 cm2 and multiple spots >1 rem/hour on 
contact.  We, therefore, prescribe plastic suits and PAPHs for an HP and SRO to 
enter the cavity during reactor head set.

I was challenged to determine why other plants experience contamination levels 
< 200,000 dpm/100 cm2 and are able to allow entry into the cavity without 
respiratory protection during reactor head set.


1.    What are your typical radiological conditions in the cavity during 
reactor head set at your station (e.g., contamination levels)



2.    What are your station's requirements for respiratory protection and 
protective clothing for workers in the cavity during reactor head set?



3.    Also, is there feasibly anything that can be done to improve Surry's 
radiological conditions in the cavity during reactor head set?  We do not have 
polished cavity surfaces and do not perform ultrasonic cleaning of spent fuel.

A quick response would be greatly appreciated.

Jim Keithley
Sr. Health Physicist
Surry Power Station
(757) 365-2069
(757) 365-0536
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This electronic message contains information which may 
be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a 
firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender 
without an additional express written confirmation to that effect.  The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
you have received the message in error, and delete it.  Thank you.

<<inline: image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to