Anton Farygin wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:32:42 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:

On Friday 02 September 2005 16:52, Anton Farygin wrote:
This is correct ?
I'm not sure if this is correct to move the code from cpp to header file.
I think we should remove the inline definition and use normal functions
instead of inline.

Why not. Removal inline looks good for me.

Inline is a replacement for time critical macros and this is also only a
proposal for the compiler. I didn't take a deeper look in the code. Don't
see currently a reason why not use a normal function here.

Which state of the CVS?
HEAD

Did the CVS from tag VERSION_10_10_0 works for you? If not, pleas
send a patch with the changes. Thanks.
may be VERSION_0_10_10 ?

Permissions denied for anonymous :-(

$ cvs up -rVERSION_0_10_10
Password: cvs [server aborted]: cannot write
/cvsroot/powersave/CVSROOT/val-tags: Permission denied
What the ... is that?
Anonymous user cannot checkout TAGS?
Not needed too assign a bug. This need to long until a fix is there. ;) We
should contact them directly.

The tagged version of (K)powersave is available as tar.bz2 at sf.net.

Ok. Thanks.

We need to assign a bug to the forge project ...

Could you please send a patch for HEAD then. There shouldn't be any
changes in this area recently.
attached.
Did you tried to remove the inline mark?

Yes, without inline functions this code works too. ;)

Sorry for the delay.
Even it's such a small modification, I'd still like to wait until
we shipped SL10.0 (we are currently at RC1). I expect to be able to commit next 
week.
Hope that is OK with you.

    Thomas
_______________________________________________
powersave-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel

Reply via email to