I like version numbers - if POX were ever to be productised, it would need minor patches, so it'd always need some provision for minor version numbers. Ubuntu has cool names, but each one corresponds to a version number
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Murphy McCauley <[email protected]>wrote: > Currently, POX has a version number (which has been at 0.0.0 since the > beginning of time). > > I think the time is coming when we should either increment it, or we > should kill it and just go by branch name. I am leaning towards the latter > since obviously there is no meaningful version numbering going on anyway. > > Thoughts? > > -- Murphy
