All right; I'm overruled. :) I've bumped betta's version to 0.1.0. A truly momentous occasion, right?
-- Murphy On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Shabbir Ahmed wrote: > i vote for version number > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sam Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > I like version numbers - if POX were ever to be productised, it would need > minor patches, so it'd always need some provision for minor version numbers. > Ubuntu has cool names, but each one corresponds to a version number > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Murphy McCauley <[email protected]> > wrote: > Currently, POX has a version number (which has been at 0.0.0 since the > beginning of time). > > I think the time is coming when we should either increment it, or we should > kill it and just go by branch name. I am leaning towards the latter since > obviously there is no meaningful version numbering going on anyway. > > Thoughts? > > -- Murphy > >
