roman kafel wrote: > > Przed dniem Pracy w USA dzienniki przypominaja o stytuacji USA i nieszczegolnej > > pozycji gospodarczej USA. > Przypominaja ze w latach najlepszych i najwiekszego rozkwitu Ameryki place wzrosly w > latach1946 -1973 o 80%, proporcjonalnie do wzrostu wydajnosci pracy... > Ale od roku 1973 do 2003 wydajnosc wzrosla o 66% natomiast nominalne place zaledwie > o 7% nie liczac inflacji..liczac obecne zarobki sa o 23% mniejszeniz byly w roku > 2967 liczac ich sile nabywcza.... > ................................... > > If ever there was a Labor Day for American workers to celebrate, this sure isn't > > the one. It's now 30 years since the end of the "golden era" for American labor, > > which by most accounting ended in 1973. Over the past 30 > years the productivity of the people whose brain and muscle creates the wealth of > the world's richest nation has grown by 66 percent. But the wage of the typical > employee – the median wage – has grown by only 7 percent. > > This one statistic says more than the volumes of hype and tripe that will fill the > > papers and the air waves on Labor Day. It encapsulates the most > massive redistribution of income in American history, from the poor, from workers, > from former middle classes – to the rich and the super-rich. As billionaire Warren > Buffett said to ABC's Ted Koppel last month, "If it's > class warfare, my class is winning." > > What these numbers mean is that while American labor has continued producing more > > goods and services, the vast majority of employees have barely shared at all in > > the fruits of their increasing productivity. Compare these past 30 years with the > > first half of the post World War II era (1946-1973), when the typical wage grew by > > nearly 80 percent, or about in line with productivity growth. > > At the lower rungs of the economic ladder, the results of this "regime change" are > > even more pronounced. Ten million minimum wage workers – 71 percent of whom are > > not teenagers – now earn about 23 percent less, in terms of real purchasing power, > > than they did in 1967. > > RomanK > podobna sytucja w Kanadzie, niestety zaden z dziennikow nie wskazuje na lichwe jako takiej sytuacji przyczyne, ani na ile wzrosla ich, tych dziennikow, wydajnosc ;-)
uklony Andrzej
