david eddy wrote: >jeremy blossom wrote: > > > >>Hmm... just an idea, but why not a "screensaver mode"? >> >> > >I am grateful that he has asked the same question I was going to. > >Can anyone answer this? > >
any eyecandy would hugely slow the program down. check out the speed of Seti-at-home screen saver vs the seti-at-home background service. _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
