Correction: Daniel Weinreb wrote: > > As for me, if the Google acquisition of ITA happens, chances > are that I won't be allowed to use Common Lisp, Sorry, what I meant was that it was unlikely that we'd be able to use Common Lisp for NEW projects. I am confident that Google is not so brain-dead as to require us to re-code what we have into, say, Java, just for the sake of having it be in Java.
-- Dan > and that > it's unlikely that I'll ever have a chance to use it for > a paid job ever again. Not impossible, but unlikely. > There are reasons for that. > > So as much as we may agree with the problems you are > talking about, it's very hard to solve them for real. > > -- Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > pro@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro > _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
