"Svante Carl v. Erichsen" <svante.v.erich...@web.de> writes:
> Hi! > > I should call it string-conc, conc-string, or conc->string. I should > not expect from first sight that either, string+ or string*, would > concatenate. From those names, it also would seem surprising that > they can take any sequences, not just strings, as arguments. > > I see the main merit of creating such a function of reduced generality > in that you can pass it around as a simple #'string-conc instead of > (lambda (&rest sequences) (apply #'concatenate 'string sequences)). Scheme has string-append. -- With Best Regards, Stas. _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
