On Jan 21, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Erik Winkels wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:48:50AM -0500, Daniel Weinreb wrote: >> >> Our utility library calls it "strcat". I think string-concat is >> probaby better.
I picked 'strcat' as a nod to C, but I wholeheartedly fall into the Dave Moon camp: more descriptive is better, at least for any exported names, almost always. >> >> Dave Moon established the general ethic on the Lisp machine of using >> longer, clearer names in general. > > I generally prefer more descriptive (and hence usually longer) names > but for this specific case I settled on "mkstr" from Paul Graham's "On > Lisp" years ago, because this function is used so often and many times > used inline. > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > pro@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro _______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
