The late Dan Weinreb's mileage was a lot different, mind you: http://xach.livejournal.com/278815.html
I just go completely the other way, preferring mx-what-ever to mx:what-ever by a mile. -kt On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Michael J. Forster <m...@sharedlogic.ca> wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 19:25, Pascal Costanza <p...@p-cos.net> wrote: > > Hi, > [...] > > > > Also, I agree with Kenny > > that splitting libraries into too fine-grained small little packages is > not > > a good recipe for organizing your projects. Lisp packages want to be big, > > and there is no major disadvantage in doing so, and I fear that > hierarchical > > package names encourage unnecessary fine-grained splitting. That just > > creates visibility problems, and distract from solving /actual/ problems. > [...] > > On a related note, I attempted to retrofit a 150K+ LOC application > with "inferred packages"[1] and, revision time and effort aside, I > think the only dependency problem it solved was the one it created. I > have not tried it with a larger or smaller application, and, of > course, YMMV. > > Mike > > > [1] > http://davazp.net/2014/11/26/modern-library-with-asdf-and-package-inferred-system.html > > -- Kenneth Tilton 54 Isle of Venice Dr Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 k...@tiltontec.com http://tiltontec.com @tiltonsalgebra 646-269-1077 "In a class by itself." *-Macworld*