Well, I thought, after delving deeper into the code, that it might be some kind of sophisticated programmer humor, making a comment about the vast amount of CPU cycles devoted to nonsensical computing or some such…
- DM > On Dec 18, 2017, at 15:54, Pascal Bourguignon <p...@informatimago.com> wrote: > > > >> On 18 Dec 2017, at 23:31, David McClain <d...@refined-audiometrics.com >> <mailto:d...@refined-audiometrics.com>> wrote: >> >> umm… was this supposed to be some kind of joke? I’ll bite... I don’t get it. >> I was actually hoping to learn something here... >> >> But the code does look rather peculiar on close inspection. Why the use of >> macros for pushing new transaction blocks? And the conversions to octet >> vectors may work for strings, but not in general for arbitrary integer or >> float values… >> >> If it is supposed to be a joke, I’ll chuckle and just chuck the code… > > I guess not: > https://dev.to/damcosset/trying-to-understand-blockchain-by-making-one-ce4 > <https://dev.to/damcosset/trying-to-understand-blockchain-by-making-one-ce4> > It’s like, everybody will be busy implementing blockchains. It’s the new > fizz-buzz… > > > > -- > __Pascal J. Bourguignon__ > > >