there was no master branch before ... or i was blind. i recall there was only old-master, stable-0.4, and when lmms-1.0 was release they created stable-1.0. anyway, with master branch there the ebuild should definitely use master branch :-)
m. Dne 24.3.2014 21:54, Matt Henley napsal(a): > I thought -9999 is using for development versions. Based on their > mailing list, it looks like stable-1.0 is for backporting fixes and > "master" is used for new development. What is your intention with > this ebuild? > > Mailing list email: > > *Re: [LMMS-devel] Any critical issue left? > <http://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/32139347/>* > From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gm...> - 2014-03-24 18:42:12 > Hi, > > I agree on the proposed branching model and pushed everything accordingly. > > Important note for all users: if you compile LMMS from Git, please > switch to the stable-1.0 branch: > > git checkout -b stable-1.0 origin/stable-1.0 > > Then you can do "git pull" from time to time. If you want unstable > stuff which is going to be included in 1.1 (Q2/2014) checkout the > master branch instead. > > Toby > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > hi, > > with lmms 1.0 release upstream created new branch so it's needed to > update branch in the ebuild aswell. > > m. > >
