Le Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:02:15 +0100, "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> there was no master branch before ... or i was blind. i recall there > was only old-master, stable-0.4, and when lmms-1.0 was release they > created stable-1.0. anyway, with master branch there the ebuild should > definitely use master branch :-) According to http://lmms.sourceforge.net/download.php it is git clone https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.git We can just reverse the last commit. Cheers, Dominique > > m. > > Dne 24.3.2014 21:54, Matt Henley napsal(a): > > I thought -9999 is using for development versions. Based on their > > mailing list, it looks like stable-1.0 is for backporting fixes and > > "master" is used for new development. What is your intention with > > this ebuild? > > > > Mailing list email: > > > > *Re: [LMMS-devel] Any critical issue left? > > <http://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/32139347/>* > > From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gm...> - 2014-03-24 18:42:12 > > Hi, > > > > I agree on the proposed branching model and pushed everything > > accordingly. > > > > Important note for all users: if you compile LMMS from Git, please > > switch to the stable-1.0 branch: > > > > git checkout -b stable-1.0 origin/stable-1.0 > > > > Then you can do "git pull" from time to time. If you want unstable > > stuff which is going to be included in 1.1 (Q2/2014) checkout the > > master branch instead. > > > > Toby > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > with lmms 1.0 release upstream created new branch so it's > > needed to update branch in the ebuild aswell. > > > > m. > > > > >
