Hi Dick, Simon,
On Monday, February 3, 2003 at 6:38 pm,
dick.roadnight-at-btopenworld.com, dick.roadnight-at-btopenworld.com, wrote:
> I would try interpolating up the file to 1,8000 pixels square for
> printing at 300 ppi, but if the output will be to an Epson (e.g. the 44
> inch 9600, which that nice man at Newbury has) they would get a better
> result printing at 720 ppi.
If by 720ppi you mean the image size - [rather than printer resolution
selected on the Epson] then I'd add that Simon would also get good
results from a file at 240 or even 180ppi, and a more manageable file
size.
Simon, don't forget the unsharp masking either!
Regards
NeilB
- - - - Consulting in Imaging & Colour Management - - - -
custom scanner and printer profiles, training on Trident & Imacon Scanning
- - - - - we supply Gretag and eyeOne, also XRite & OptiCal - - - - - -
p:44 (0)1273 774704 m:44 (0)7778 160201 http://www.neilbarstow.co.uk/
http://www.apple.com/uk/creative/neilbarstow/
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
