Hello Steven Poe,

--- Steven Poe wrote:
> Perhaps I didn't state the question clearly.  >   Is
> there any 
> degradation to image quality when converting to LAB?

I don't think so. If there is, it is, at least to my
eyes (what I see on my screen), not perceptible...

> 
> The reason for converting to LAB and downsizing in
> 50% increments with 
> USM applied at each level is to achieve far superior
> JPEGS for web use, 
> while maintaining a "one size fits all" work flow.
> JPEGS down sampled 
> in this way accurately represent a high resolution
> scan or digital file 
> without artifacts or loss of tonal range. The best
> description of the 
> technique I know of is by David Riecks at : 
>
http://www.controlledvocabulary.com/imagedatabases/downsampling.html
> 
I've been using this recipe to downsample my images
whenever needed, but not all of them.

> Pedro Luz Cunha are you Brazilian ?

Yes. I am brazilian, living in Brasilia, Brazil ;-)

[]s
Pedro Luz Cunha


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to