Bob
I was with you till the last paragraph.
This is not a moderated list. List mums are there make sure that 'technically' you stay within the list guidelines and that you do not stray too far from the core 'professional digital image production' questions on which this list is based.
It is down to listers to define what they are discussing. The subject you Bob, have just defined is fundamental - so discuss it. Which list mum is stopping you? If you want listers to define things - ask them.
Sorry Jorge (this week's list mum) - I'm sure you will want to answer yourself . This was my personal opinion - not the duty list mum's!!
Best
Francis Newman
On 29 Jul 2004, at 16:34, Bob Croxford wrote:
Dear List
There have been threads running on several other forums about clients becoming disillusioned about digital file quality. Whether this is a growing trend, as some suggest, I don't know. I do have a gut feeling that many photographers, who held off from buying digital cameras because their theoretical knowledge was lacking, have now taken the plunge without increasing their ability to handle digital files.
And much else till this bit
Instead of list mums acting like victorian schoolteachers over the dreaded [at] symbol could we have them ask for a bit more precision? Could we ask for a few simple definitions in questions?
Print; Inkjet or offset litho? Digital capture; Jpeg or RAW? Flash Lighting; Studio or built-in camera?
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
