> In regard to profiling Sinar has made some, ahem, implementation > decisions I strongly disagree about and has said as much in May when I > first got the software. Hi Thomas, I saw you demonstrating PM5 to profile a sinar back earlier this year.. At that time you seemed reasonably optimistic.... Now you've had a good look, are you saying that using cpatureshop 5, it's futile to expect to profile a sinarback (i.e. get results that will be "better/more targeted" than sinar's own calibration system) unless one has a high degree of profile making expertise?
>"It's a long process if you want to get it right. Remember you need to >build profile(s) that will fit almost anything as well as establish a >proper workflow for the photographer/publisher/museum in question." I am not sure if your comments hear apply to sinar or not....Do you mean that it's difficult but you've managed to get results on the sinar that you deem better than without camera profiling, even if one has a target/aim similar to that of the generic sinar system, can improvements be made? Best regards Andy =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
