There has been some objective testing done and I don't have anything to do with the testers [ http://www.barefeats.com/pentium4.html ]. Judge for yourself. Being fair and balanced, I will submit I am an event-driven logician so prefer and own Macs and Nikons.
LOL On 11/29/04 9:57 AM, "Paul Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its that time of the year when I think about upgrading the > processing/motherboard on my PC. > > The question is, is it worth bothering? Or is it better waiting until > I can afford a G5 Mac? > > I currently have an Athlon 2400 based machine, homebuilt. The latest > generation of Athlon 64 chips seem to have quite a lot more poke than > this. However, I switched to a Mac for my laptop and much prefer the > stability of Mac OSX to windoze. As I am a long term Unix bod I prefer > to have a unix flavour burbling away underneath as well. > > Mainly I want to get more performance out of Photoshop, and it seems > that the Mac claims to have the edge. Anyone got firmer information on > this? > > So to summarise: > > 1) Is Mac a better option for performance in Photoshop? > 2) On the Athlon side, what do people recommend? > 3) Any idea if a 64 bit version of Photoshop will make any difference > in the near future? > > > PRW Freeman > www.architecturalimages.co.uk > www.corporatephotographyonline.co.uk > +44 (0)7973 165 360 > > =============================================================== > GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
