Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi Michael, > > This is great - thanks a lot! > > Michael Hierweck wrote: > >Hi Martin, > > > >Martin Aspeli wrote: > >> > >> - Areas where there's insufficient/poor documentation, but once you > >>learn how to do something, it's clear how to proceed. > > > >* How Plone make use of underlying technologies > > Agree - we should document this better. > > >* How to extend member profiles > > Agree - we probably need better technology for this.
90% of the times someone asks for this the correct answer is simply 'add properties in portal_memberdata', which has been working for years. For the common case I still remain unconvinced we need remember, membrane, ore.member or something else.. > To me, p.a.c today is a building block for bigger and better things that > are still in the R&D phase. I'ld call it an experimental prototype. You can do things with it, but we may just as well replace it with something else. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
