Reinout van Rees wrote:
Daniel Nouri schreef:
For simple content types, do we need something other than
plone.app.content and a supporting form library? (I had the impression
that you're doing this in some projects already, Martin?) And wouldn't
this approach, once it's proven to work well, tremendously simplify the
story of developing with Plone?
plone.app.content is something that flew under my radar somehow. I
originally saw it as a place for content-related stuff to end up: folder
listings and so. That is what I encountered when grepping.
Content types, too? I did see something in there. That's probably
something that has to be advertised a bit more.
don't we want to NOT advertise it if its not best practice?
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
